|
KMID : 1004520120280020119
|
|
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science
2012 Volume.28 No. 2 p.119 ~ p.128
|
|
|
Retention of CAD/CAM Metal Copings Cemented on Short Titanium Abutments with Different Cements
|
|
Kim Hyo-Jung
Song Eun-Young
Yoon Ji-Young
Lee Si-Ho
Oh Nam-Sik
Lee Yong-Keun
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
State of problem: Cement-retained implant-supported prostheses are routinely used in dentistry. The use of high strength
cements has become more popular with the increasing confidence in the stability of the implant-abutment screw connection and the high survival rates of osseointegrated implants. No clinical data on retention of metal copings using CAD/CAM. To evaluate retention of metal copings using CAD/CAM system bonded to short titanium abutment with four different cements and compare retentive strength of metal copings with sandblasting or without sandblasting before cementation. Forty titanium abutment blocks were fabricated and divided into 4 groups of 10 samples each. Forty metal copings with occlusal hole to allow for retention testing were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology. The four cements were Fujicem(Fuji, Japan), Maxcem Elite(Kerr, USA), Panavia F2.0(Kurarary, Japan) and Superbond C&B(Sunmedical, Japan). The copings were cemented on the titanium abutment according to manufacture’s recommendation. All samples were stored for 24h at 37oC in 100% humidity and tested for retention using universal testing machine(Instron) at a crosshead speed of 1.0mm/min. Force at retentive failure was recorded in Newton. The mode of failure was also recorded. Means and standard deviations of loads at failure were analyzed using ANOVA and Paired t-test. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Panavia F2.0 provided significantly higher retentive strength than Fujicem, Maxcem Elite(P<0.05). Sandblasting significantly increased bond strength(P<0.05). The mode of failure was cement remaining principally on metal copings. Within the limitation of this study, Panavia F2.0 showed significantly stronger retentive strength than Fujicem, Maxcem Elite(p<0.05). The Ranking order of the cements to retain the copings was Panavia F2.0, Fujicem = Maxcem Elite. Sandblasting significantly increased bond strength(P<0.05). The retentive strength of metal copings on implant abutment were influenced by surface roughness and type of cements.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Retention, CAD/CAM, Resin cement, Implant
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|